However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 16, 2011, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving on a sound driving) from the Changwon District Court (Seoul District Court) on the roads located in the front of the Dong-gun B, not around 20:34 on April 21, 2020, the Defendant driven a FLstren car with approximately 0.129% alcohol concentration in the front of the E Hospital located in the same Gun, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 3km at around the roads located in the same Gun.

Accordingly, the prohibition of drinking driving was violated not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of crackdown on drinking driving, report on the results of crackdown on drinking driving, report on the circumstantial statements of drinking drivers, and investigation report (report on the circumstantial situations of drinking drivers);

1. Criminal records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (Attachment to a summary order of the same attached power);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (Article 53 and 55(1)3 of the same Act does not relax a case in light of the blood alcohol concentration and the criminal records of the same kind, but does not repeat a crime in depth, and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing are taken into consideration);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the repeated consideration of the favorable circumstances in the above);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;