beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.02.24 2016고단1450

공갈등

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On Jan. 27, 2105, the Defendant, who was at the right time near the second-class park located in the middle-class city of Daegu, Seogu, Daegu, 2005, was at the time when the victim C(54) et al. was at the right time called “accomcing from the former operation” with the victim C(54) et al., and the Defendant was at the time when the victim was at the right time of the Defendant’s hand.

In other words, due to the defect that it is impossible to pay money, the head is faced with two parts of the victim's head, and the face face is several times in drinking, and if the victim does not comply with it, he saw that he would cause harm to the body of the victim, and he received 1370,000 won in cash.

B. On January 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) assaulted the victim at the place indicated in the preceding port at around 20:00 and 1.370,000 won in cash; (b) frighted the victim’s head head at two times; (c) frighted the victim’s head head at two times; (d) frighted the victim’s face; and (e) frighted the victim’s face with drinking water; and (e) boomed the victim’s head at two weeks; and (e) frighted the victim’s head

2. The Defendant did not have received money from an investigative agency to this court by inflicting an injury on the victim or sculing the victim, and rather, the Defendant received money from the victim by assaulting the victim, and is disputing the facts charged.

There are statements made by the victim, D, and E in an investigative agency, a diagnosis of injury to the victim, and a photographs of the upper part of the body.

However, the statements made by the victim, D, and E in an investigative agency are ① D was under the influence of alcohol at this time in this court, and the defendant and the victim appeared to have been fighting and fighting, but the receipt of the statements was not memory, and the defendant did not seem to have received money, and the victim did not receive money. The victim received money.

In addition, the Defendant did not take money from one another, and the Defendant was able to receive money from one another. At the time of making a statement in an investigative agency, the issue of the Defendant’s debt and the fighting.