인사발령(전보조치) 및 고충대기자 순위명부삭제취소
1. The part of the lawsuit in this case seeking cancellation of the act of deletion on the list of the order of priority of the grievance.
2. The defendant.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on February 18, 1989, and was promoted to the Inspector on September 1, 201, and served in the Busan Jin Police Station B district from January 23, 2017.
B. On July 12, 2017, the Defendant issued a personnel order to transfer the Plaintiff from the Busan Jin Police Station to the Busan Jin Police Station on July 14, 2017 upon the request of the head of Busan Jin Police Station to issue a personnel order on July 14, 2017.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant personnel order”) C.
On the other hand, the defendant conducts regular personnel exchanges to solve grievances for police officers below the Inspector, and to this end, the Busan Metropolitan City Local Police Agency Ombudsman(hereinafter “Grievance Review Committee”) is prepared according to the review and decision of the Ombudsman Committee of the Local Police Agency.
On July 2014, the Plaintiff submitted a “compacter between police stations,” who wishes to move to the Geum Jong Police Station, which is one of the police stations, on the ground of the education of children, and was registered in the list of the order of priority in the grievances in the second half of 2014 according to the decision of the Ombudsman Committee
On July 20, 2017, the Plaintiff was granted Nos. 60 and 2 of the order of priority prior to the issuance of regular personnel affairs. The Defendant deleted the Plaintiff’s name from the order of priority on July 20, 2017, pursuant to Article 24(5) of the Regulations on Personnel Management of the Busan Regional Police Agency’s Personnel Management on the ground that the Plaintiff was transferred to the Busan Local Police Agency following the instant order of personnel management.
(hereinafter “instant deletion”). E.
On August 2, 2017, the Plaintiff requested the appeals review committee to revoke the instant personnel order and deletion. However, on November 2, 2017, the Plaintiff decided to dismiss the request for revocation of the instant deletion, and was dismissed upon the request for revocation of the instant personnel order.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 8, 13 and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Main Safety.