도로법위반
The defendant is innocent.
The summary of the facts charged in this case is that, around January 8, 2008, at around 3:17, 2008, the employee A violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle by the road management authority in the operation of B vehicles on the road in front of the Dong-ri, Dong-ri, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong
Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005 and wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008), which is a applicable provision to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated according to the Constitutional Court Decision 2008HunGa17 Decided July 30, 2009.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.