However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] On February 12, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) in the original state support of the Chuncheon District Court on September 21, 2009, a fine of five million won for a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) in the original state support of the Chuncheon District Court on September 21, 2009, and three million won for a fine of three million won for a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) in the support of the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-cheon on June 2, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On September 17, 2017, the Defendant was driving a car with C tax-free zone without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 1 k from the 1km to the 1km of the Agricultural Cooperative, the Dogdong-gun, the Gyeongdong-gu, the Gyeongdong-gu, the Gyeongdong-gun, the Gyeongdong-gun, the Gyeongdong-gun, the Gyeongdong-gun, the Gyeongdong-gun

2. On September 17, 2017, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol by a police officer E belonging to the D District Police Station, who called up after receiving a report of 112 that there is a vehicle suspected of driving alcohol on the front side of the Glock-gun, Glock-gun, Glock-gun, Glock-gun, Glock-gun, Gldong Police Station, for drinking, while driving the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling the Defendant and drinking red at the face

Due to reasonable grounds, it was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting the whole in a drinking measuring instrument.

Nevertheless, the defendant, "I am the reporter, I am the subject of the report, I am the step to be driven directly by I Ra, and I am.

“A police officer did not comply with a police officer’s demand for alcohol testing on four occasions in total without justifiable grounds, such as putting his/her bath into a drinking measuring instrument, avoiding the measurement of drinking, etc.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, who attempted to leave the scene without disclosing his personal information at the date, time, and place described in paragraph 2, thereby blocking a police slope F by a police officer slope belonging to the D District Police Station, from the front of the Defendant.

“Along with the desire to take a bath, the body of the F was tightly tightly pushed down, the f’s chest was tightly pushed down by hand, and the f’s chest was pushed down once.

Accordingly, the defendant is a police officer on the handling of 112 reports.