beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2019.02.15 2017고단1764

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 15, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated a DNA car not covered by mandatory insurance from around approximately KRW 2.4 km to the roads adjacent to the 11:55 vehicle driving license, from the 2.4km section around the 2.4km section to the same Si EXPO.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and the Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act driving a car with the above car sirens around the date specified in paragraph (1) and driving the roads in front of the C EXPO 1 along the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lane roads

In this case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the front left and to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering direction and the brake system of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and operated without a license, with the driving of the G EX car in the atmosphere signaled by the victim F (59 years of age) at the front part of the Defendant vehicle, and caused the said EX car to be driven by the victim H(66 years of age) who stops in front of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the said victim F and the said EXE car (the age of 57) to the victim J (the age of 57) who was taking advantage of the said EXE car for about three weeks, and the victim K (the age of 62) and the same victim L (the age of 68) who was taking advantage of the said EXE for about two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant suffered injury, such as fluent tension, etc., from each other, for approximately KRW 1,44,58 of the repair cost by using the said EX car exchange, etc., and damaged the said EXE car to take up approximately KRW 474,878 of the repair cost by using the panion exchange, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. The police of the defendant.