However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2014. 5. 17. 03:20경 인천 부평구 부평대로 8 부평119안전센터 앞 도로에서, 피고인이 택시요금을 지불하지 아니하고 잠을 자고 있다는 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 경찰공무원인 부평경찰서 C지구대 1팀 소속 경장 피해자 D으로부터 택시요금을 지불하고 귀가할 것을 권유받자 위 피해자에게 “야 시발 짭새 새끼야 니들이 뭔데 간섭이야”라고 욕설을 하며 머리로 피해자의 얼굴을 들이받았다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. In order to establish the legal order of the country with reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act and eradicate the light of the public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties. However, although the defendant is against his or her wrong recognition, and the defendant is the first offender without any previous conviction, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account all the factors of sentencing as indicated in the argument of the instant case, such as