2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. 1) E (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”)

Around April 6, 2010, the F Hospital run by the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”) as a snick in which the Defendant is unable to take smelling around April 6, 2010.

(2) On May 27, 2010, the medical personnel at the Defendant hospital found the deceased’s heart loss and abnormal symptoms as a result of the diagnosis of chronic dysium infection with the deceased and the pre-examination for the surgery. (2) On May 27, 2010, the medical personnel at the Defendant hospital found the deceased’s heart loss and serious dysium loss of the size of 0.6 and 0.8cm with the heart, and found the deceased’s heart loss and serious dysium loss of the size of 0.76 cm between the heart and the heart of the deceased on May 31, 2010.

3) On June 3, 2010, the Deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital for an operation, and Defendant D, a doctor with the chest scarcity of the Defendant Hospital, was at the Defendant Hospital on June 9, 2010, in order to verify that the deceased’s scarcity was closed, and the scarcity was carried out, using a scarcity to the deceased on June 9, 2010, and that the scarcity was flad by a scarcity, and that the scarcity was flad by a scarcity as a result of a scarcity surgery (hereinafter “the first operation”).

(4) On June 25, 2010, after the first operation, 2010. As a result of the spawnation of the spawn’s ewnosis, MRSA was discovered.

B. On June 28, 2010, the second surgery was conducted by the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital on June 28, 2010, and confirmed that the meatitis occurred, such as the discovery of the proliferation of the part of the operation, which is the part of the operation, as a result of the examination on the deceased, and the proliferation of the part of the operation was conducted, and the deceased’s chest was cut off on June 29, 2010, and the deceased’s chest was cut off, cut off the part of the first operation, and replaced it with the body of the public trial. The operation was conducted to cut the part of the part of the large mecule (hereinafter “the second operation”).

(b).