재물손괴등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Punishment of the crime
On June 8, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. in Gyeyang Branch of the District Court on March 8, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 16th of the same month, and is
Criminal facts
1. The Defendant: (a) around 01:50 on June 17, 2013, while drinking alcohol together with F, the main point of “E” of the Victim D’s Operation in Pariju City, Pariju, the Defendant: (b) told the victim that “I will see how I will see the Pari, I will die with Chinese people,” and (c) told the victim that I would be able to be able to be scired in the market value by cutting off the main place, which is the victim’s ownership in that place.
Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.
2. At the time and place specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant committed assault, such as drinking the face of the said G at one time, on the part of G, who was dispatched to the police station by receiving the said D’s report and received an explanation of the situation to F, and used the said G’s slope at the police station.
As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch response and reception guidance of police officers 112.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement made to G, D, and H;
1. Investigation report (the first front speech and investigation of a shote);
1. Application of statutes on site damage photographs;
1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;
1. From among concurrent offenders, there is a bad quality of the crime by assaulting a police officer who performs official duties for the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, and obstructing his duties; there is a record of having been punished for the same kind of crime from around 2010 to several times; re-offending during the suspension period of the execution of the same crime; it is not possible to agree with the victim; Provided, That the defendant is against the crime of this case; damage and assault.