(a) the Chuncheon District Court with respect to the immovables 1 to 4;

A. The Plaintiff, as a Canadian citizen, was an oriental medical doctor in the U.S. and Japan, and became aware of the police officer C during July 200 while operating a member in the ASEAN in Japan, and became de facto marital relationship.

B. On February 15, 2002, the sale of real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 4 in the name of C is based on the sale and purchase on February 15, 20

2. 21. Completion of the registration of ownership transfer; and on April 30, 2014 with respect to the 5 real estate listed in the separate sheet, it shall be based on sale and purchase.

5. 8. He/she shall complete the registration of ownership transfer, and complete the registration of ownership transfer on September 17, 2014 for the attached list 6 real estate on the same day.

C. Of the 7 real estate listed in the separate sheet, 3,305/141,719 shares among the 3,305/141,719 shares in the attached list are completed on October 20, 206 by reason of sale as of October 19, 2006 in the name of C and the Plaintiff’s Dong-si D. The registration of ownership transfer was completed on February 3, 2015.

2.6. Completion of the registration of ownership transfer in C’s name.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) each real estate listed in the attached list is d.

As to each real estate of this case, B.

the seller in this subsection and the seller in this subsection.

From among the paragraphs, the seller D recognizes that he/she completed the registration of ownership transfer to C by concluding a contract at the plaintiff's request.

E. C died on June 14, 2017, and the Defendant, as the sole inheritor, succeeded to the property.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap's 3 through 11, 15 through 18, 20, 23 through 27, Eul's evidence 1, witness E, F, and purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Judgment on the parties’ assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (the first Plaintiff purchased each of the instant real estate from the seller who was unaware of the title trust agreement, and transferred the ownership registration in the name of C, and the Defendant asserted that the ownership should be returned to C as unjust enrichment, but the Plaintiff changed the assertion as follows).