However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 26, 2020, at around 01:17, the Defendant driven a DMW car in the state of alcohol in the vicinity of a new intersection located in the 144-6 knife-ro of the same Gun office in the vicinity of a new intersection located in the 144-6 knife of the same Gun office, and dMW car was parked in the road near the new intersection.

Accordingly, upon receiving the 112 report, “any person opens a door,” the police officer F of the Hadong Police Station and the police officer G was dispatched. There was a considerable reason to recognize that the Defendant was driven while under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling and smelling, red, and a string.

피고인은 같은 날 03:34경부터 위 경찰관들로부터 음주측정을 요구받았으나 음주측정기에 숨을 내쉬는 시늉만 하다가, 같은 날 03:50경 경찰관이 음주측정기 불대를 교체하는 틈을 이용하여 송림공원 방면으로 도주하는 등 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정 요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the circumstantial statements, investigation report, and list of cases reported under 112 of the Liquors Act;

1. Application of investigation reports (Attachment of control photographs of police officers visiting the site), investigation reports (Attachment of photographs related to the route of operation of a vehicle under command and operating hours), and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (2) and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession, absence of the same criminal records, the environment of the defendant, etc.);

1. An order to provide community service or attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;