정정보도 등
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Basic Facts
(1) The Plaintiff’s major business objective is the company established by dividing the housing projects of Company I on December 30, 2009, the housing project sector of Company B, the housing and commercial construction business, the real estate leasing and selling business, etc. (2) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a newspaper company published “G” and online newspaper H, which is a major reference week. Defendant C is the representative director of Company B, the editor, Defendant D is the director general of the editing bureau, Defendant E is the head of the economic culture team, and Defendant F is the reporter of the economic culture team.
On November 23, 2016, the Defendants published the article of this case in G, and published the article of this case in online newspaper H as shown in attached Table 3 of the article of this case in G (hereinafter “instant article”). On the same day, online newspaper H also published the article of this case.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1 and 2, and the purport of the whole argument as to the plaintiff's assertion that the defendants asserted the purport of the whole argument from the article of this case ① The Government of K in December 29, 1999, which was enforced on December 29, 199 in the article of this case, refers to the "accounting 56-90" (Evidence No. 1) of the "accounting 56-90" as to the settlement of accounts for the housing units sold after the lease by the constructor of rental housing. As such, the plaintiff's debt ratio decreased so that the plaintiff's business can be increased, and the plaintiff's business was grown by the sales thereof, and the plaintiff's business was increased in the process, and the plaintiff's L's L's business chairperson and the K government was entrusted with the plaintiff's L'
'' has damaged the plaintiff's reputation by expressing false facts.
Therefore, Defendant B is obligated to jointly pay the Plaintiff a solatium amounting to KRW 5 million and damages for delay if Defendant B did not perform his/her duty to publish a correction statement in attached Form 1 in attached Form 1, and the online newspaper H, respectively. In addition, Defendant B is jointly obligated to pay the Plaintiff a solatium amounting to KRW 50 million and the damages for delay.
claim for a corrective report.