beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.09.14 2017고정962

도로교통법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 16, 2017, at around 08:04, the Defendant driven a so-called “Wnd-purd-pured-pured-pured-pured-pured-pured-pured-pured-pured-pured-pured-pured-purd-p

In such cases, drivers of horses that walk roads shall follow signals and directions displayed by traffic safety facilities.

Nevertheless, the defendant violated the signal by disregarding and continuing the signal even though the vehicle signal was the stop signal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Control manual [The defendant asserts that, even if the signals of the intersection in this case begin to be changed to yellow, it is not possible to stop on the stop line immediately before the crosswalk on the street. However, this is merely premised on the presumed distance of suspension in theory when passing at the highest speed within the restricted speed, and it is not clear and appropriate that there are many grounds presented by the defendant.

For example, the ordinary car is 54 meters wide at the time of driving at the speed of 80km (A). In the actual case of the defendant, in the process of operating a road in accordance with the stop signals, the suspension line of the crosswalk is not much excessive, but the problem of the above intersection, which the defendant asserts, is not irrelevant to the defendant's case, is applied to the law.

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 156 subparagraph 1 and 5 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;