When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. On July 17, 2014, from around 14:15 to 14:30, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim D, operated by the victim D, who had been punished for the crime of interference with business by the victim’s report by the victim’s wife F during the seven-year period, and without entering the above shop, the Defendant d’s disturbance, such as the victim’s “B”, “I am, I am,” and “I am, I am son, I am son, so I am.,” and thereby interfered with the victim’s business operation by force by preventing entry of customers who had come to the above zone.

2. On July 17, 2014, from around 15:30 to 15:50, the Defendant, in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, found the Defendant under the influence of alcohol in the Defendant’s criminal charge and office in the Kunju Police Station and office in the Kusan-dong, and, on the basis of the fact, the Defendant, “Is the investigation why is being conducted, is why it would be why it would be done, and the Defendant, who would be faced with a fine due to the obstruction of performance of official duties, shall be a very rough and disorderly horse at a public office.”

3. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2014. 7. 17. 16:35경 원주시 봉산동에 있는 원주경찰서 유치장 3호실에서, 위 제2항과 같은 행위로 현행범인 체포되어 입감된 상태에서 그곳 쇠창살을 손으로 치며 “내가 뭘 잘못했냐, 형사 개새끼들 내가 모가지를 딴다”라고 큰소리치며 다른 유치인들의 평온을 방해하여 원주경찰서 경찰관 G, H로부터 같은 유치장 내 방음시설이 갖춰진 보호유치실로 이감되는 과정에서 이에 대항하여, 자신의 팔을 잡고 있는 G과 H의 팔을 이빨로 물려고 하고, H의 오른쪽 다리를 잡아당겨 근무복 밑단이 찢어지게 하는 등 G과 H을 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order in the detention room of the above police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the respective police protocol protocol to I, D, G, H and J

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;