도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment, three years of suspended execution, etc.) is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. The lower court determined the sentence by fully taking account of all the circumstances that the prosecutor asserts on the grounds of appeal.
Criminal records due to the drinking of the defendant are several years, and they do not repeat again while they are against the law.
In this case, even if the court below's punishment is too weak even if the defendant re-examines all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the record, including the fact that the defendant was found to have been exposed while driving a day after taking the waters after drinking the previous day.
It does not seem that it does not appear.
Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is not accepted.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.