If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 16:30 on October 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) contacted the victim E (the age of 34) with the offland driven by the victim D (the age of 35) in front of the Korean bank located in the west-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Busan, in order to prevent the Defendant’s flight; (b) caused the key of the said vehicle by the victim E (the age of 35) in order to prevent the Defendant’s flight; and (c) caused the victim E (the age of 35) to live in the head of the D; (d) caused the victim’s flaps; and (e) caused the victim’s face by drinking; and (e) caused the victim E’s flabbbing with flaps; and (e) caused the victim E’s flabing with the flaps; and (e) caused the victim’s injury to the victim, such as the victim’s flabbbing site, arms, and fla.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocol of the examination of witnesses D or E of this Court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of photographs), investigation reports (Attachment of a medical certificate);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel regarding the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Code of the Labor House Detention in the Labor House: (a) the Defendant and the defense counsel argued that the Defendant’s act constitutes self-defense and thus, the Defendant’s act constitutes self-defense; (b) according to the evidence examined by this court, the Defendant was in contact with the vehicle boarding by the victims and the two senior citizens immediately before the occurrence of the accident; (c) the Defendant, while misrepresenting the Seoul District Prosecutor’s Office at the time of the occurrence of the accident, caused a serious desire for the senior citizens; (d) the Defendant and the defense counsel got out of the Defendant and the disabled to defend them by violence from the two victims; and (e) one of the senior citizens was at the time when the victim D got out of the off, and (e) one of the aforementioned senior citizens