A. The parties 1) The defendant is the Korea Sports Council established under the National Sports Promotion Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Korea Sports Council").

) is the branch office of Incheon Metropolitan City and the Korea Lottery Association of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Lottery Association”).

The Korea Sports Council is a central competition organization affiliated with the Korea Sports Council. The Incheon Metropolitan City Lottery Association (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Association”).

(2) The plaintiffs are members of the Association of this case as the members of the Association of this case, and the plaintiff A is the leader of the D High School Uniformsing Team in Nam-gu Incheon, and the defendant B is the leader of the F High School Uniformsing Team in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon.

B. Disciplinary action against the plaintiffs 1) The Legal Punishment Committee of the Association of this case (hereinafter “Disciplinary Committee”) shall be deemed to be a disciplinary committee.

(2) On February 2, 2015, the Plaintiffs’ petition as indicated in the attached Form (hereinafter “instant petition”).

(2) On the ground that the Plaintiff’s act of receiving the signature of the members of the Association of this case constitutes an act detrimental to the development of happiness, such as creating a strike within the Association and promoting conflicts (Article 15(1)9 of the Legislation and Punishment Committee Regulations), the Plaintiff made a decision on the suspension of qualification for the Plaintiff A, the suspension of qualification for the Plaintiff B, and the suspension of qualification for the Plaintiff B, and the suspension of qualification for the five-year disciplinary action against the Plaintiff (the committee made a decision on disciplinary action, such as reprimand, I, I, and J, on the ground that the Plaintiff signed the instant petition against G, H, I

(2) Although the Plaintiffs filed a request for review on the above disciplinary resolution with respect to the instant Association, the Plaintiffs again resolved on February 17, 2015 on the penalty for the instant Association’s disciplinary action.

(hereinafter “instant initial disciplinary action.” The Plaintiffs filed an objection against the Defendant on February 25, 2015, and the Defendant’s Disciplinary Committee on April 30, 2015, stating that “The Plaintiff’s illegality is clearly recognized, but the Plaintiff’s performance of guidance, etc. is considered.”