손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and it is reasonable to accept the reasoning of this judgment, except for the dismissal or addition.
2. Parts to be removed or added;
A. The main body of the judgment of the court of first instance, 10 pages 3, 10 of the written judgment of the court of first instance, shall be “A evidence 11, 12” and “A evidence 11, 15.”
B. The following statements shall be added to the third '3. Judgment' end of the first instance judgment.
The plaintiff filed a petition with the Ministry of National Defense in relation to the instant case, but the office and the cost transferred the case to the Ministry of National Defense; the procedure was repeated by the Ministry of National Defense to transfer the case to the Ministry of National Defense; the plaintiff trusted it in the manner that the plaintiff seems to resolve the problem related to the plaintiff; and the plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit within a considerable period of time; thus, the defendant's assertion for the completion of extinctive prescription cannot be allowed against the good faith principle. However, there is no evidence to prove that the plaintiff appeared to have resolved the problem related to the plaintiff in the Cheongdaedae, National Defense, or the security company, etc., as above, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit without any need to further examine.
3. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable.
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed for lack of reason.