사기
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for four months.
However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for one year of imprisonment in the case of fraud in the Young-gu District Court Young-gu District Court on July 14, 2017, and the judgment on July 22, 2017 becomes final and conclusive on July 22, 2017, and is currently under suspended sentence.
【Criminal facts E, Defendant A opened a mobile phone in the name of a person who does not actually intend to use the mobile phone, and then disposed of the opened mobile phone immediately and divided the profits therefrom. Defendant A recruited persons who will be the nominal owner. Defendant A opened a mobile phone with the name of the nominal owner as “H” in Daegu-gu cell phone store operated by G in the name of the nominal owner to the place where the nominal owner exists. Defendant A opened a mobile phone with the documents submitted by the nominal owner to the radio station and shared the role of disposing of them.
1. The joint crimes of E, Defendant A, and G are committed on September 12, 2016 by the first female-friendly job offers I who was assaulted to himself/herself in Ulsan-si around 18:00 on September 12, 2016;
The reason why J reported the passing of the fine, and the reason why J was taken to the alleyway, the reason why he tried to open and dispose of the mobile phone in the name of J, and that he was able to put his female to H “H” by burning it on the vehicle driven by Defendant A.
E grants 10,000 won per cash per week on the opening side of a mobile phone at the same day.
The mobile phone charges and penalty referred to as "I do not know about the scope of the cell phone," and let J accept it prepare a document opening the cell phone as if you use the cell phone normally, while paying the mobile phone installment charges and charges, and submit it to K by receiving the above opening documents.
However, in fact, E, Defendant A, and G opened a cell phone in the name of J, and sold it and divided the disposal benefits, and did not think that they have the person in the name of the person in the name of the person in charge of the mobile phone to use the cell phone, and they did not have the intention or ability to pay the terminal cost.