A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Defendant

A, without registering credit business, between December 30, 208 and September 2, 201, a person who actually engaged in credit business, such as lending approximately KRW 430 million to the victim D (the victim) by 5% to 15% interest rate per 119% between December 30, 208 and September 2, 201, while Defendant B is a person who performs claims collection for Defendant A as a child of Defendant A.

1. Defendant A

A. On April 5, 2013, around 16:30 on April 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) sought the victim’s pro-Japanese who is operating the clothes with the name of “F” located in Young-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; and (b) sought the victim’s pro-Japanese who was “Chyp amb, hyp hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp; and (c) sought from the above G, “hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, hyp, a relative of the debtor in relation to the collection of claims

(b) No debt collector who committed on April 8, 2013 shall visit a related person in connection with a debt, or have the related person deliver words, letters, sound, image, or things to the related person, except in cases where he/she seeks to inquire of the debtor's location, contact information, method of identifying the debtor's location, address, etc. for debt collection.

Nevertheless, at around 09:00 on April 8, 2013, the Defendant visited the said J as a relative of the obligor, despite having knowledge of the debtor’s location, such as “I was called “I was able to get out of the office,” and “I was able to get out of the office if I was called “I was to get out of the office, I would come to get out of the office.” The Defendant visited the said J as a relative of the obligor in relation to the debtor’s debt, even though he knew of the debtor’s location.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant committed the crime in October 7, 2013, and committed on October 7, 2013. < Amended by Act No. 11650, Oct. 7, 2013>