The judgment below

In light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, found the Defendant guilty of engaging in an indecent act on August 7, 2016 among the facts charged of the instant case, did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding forced indecent act, or failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, thereby violating logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Meanwhile, even upon examining the record, there was a violation of the law that affected the judgment on the examination of witness H in the first instance trial record.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.