When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 21, 2010, the Defendant, through B at a place in an incurable manner, had several employees of banks who are well aware of, and had them to, banks.

I would like to get more loans than other banks through the appraisal company to increase the appraisal value of the land through the appraisal company, who is aware of the land appraisal fee of KRW 10,000,000,000,000.

However, since there is much much more appraisal than normal land appraisal, there is a difference between 10,000 won and land appraisal fees. On the other hand, it was false that the loan work will be conducted to obtain more than 200,000 won.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to make the victim get a loan by doing appraisal or lending work so that a higher price than normal land appraisal is determined.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired the money of KRW 10 million from the victim to the account in the name of the defendant's wife as the land appraisal fee on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against C;

1. Protocols concerning interrogation of the police in relation to B (including questioning of a suspect);

1. Investigation reports (Attachment of a detailed statement of transactions with National Bank under D) and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Analysis of details of suspect accounts);

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;