손해배상(자)
1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiff A, which corresponds to the following additional payment order.
1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, given that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and such reasoning is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of
2. A statement of calculation of damages in attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be replaced by a statement of calculation of damages in attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance.
However, “The maximum working age shall be added at the end of the third 21st century in the judgment of the first instance,” as the Plaintiff seeks.
The following shall be added at the end of 11th day of the first instance judgment:
【On the other hand, Plaintiff A asserts that an additional physical disability caused by the instant accident, such as pain pain, conical signboard escape certificate, and pelvis, was caused. On the other hand, Plaintiff A did not appeal to, or receive treatment and diagnosis of, this part of the instant accident in the course of receiving hospital treatment for a long time period of time. While the instant accident was filed and the instant lawsuit was not submitted, there was no fact that there was no other assertion of, or submission of, the relevant diagnosis report on, the instant part of the instant accident, other than the pelvise, in the instant case, the pelvise flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium.