beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.03.30 2017고단3813

위증교사

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On November 5, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment for embezzlement at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 23, 2015.

【Fact-finding on March 201, 201, the Defendant embezzled by arbitrarily disposing of or concealing nine points of his forest that he left, and there was no fact that the Defendant entrusted the F with the sale of eight points out of the forest that he left and four points of the Defendant’s forest owned by the Defendant. In addition, even though there was no fact that the Defendant made a letter of entrustment of the sale of works, the Defendant, upon request from the F, made a false document, intended to conceal his embezzlement and avoid criminal liability for embezzlement.

On October 2013, the Defendant prepared a false consignment form of works as if he/she had entrusted F with the sale of 12 points in the H’s operation of the Defendant in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G G, and F and 12 points in the G around March 4, 2011 (8 points out of E Management and 4 points in the forest owned by the Defendant). The Defendant prepared a false consignment form of works as if he/she had entrusted F with the sale of 12 points in the forest from A on March 4, 2011, but did not return it.

“A false statement is requested to the effect that “,” and F accepted the request.

In addition, when the above embezzlement case was prosecuted and F was adopted as a witness, the Defendant sent F by telephone to F by telephone from the insane located in Seoul on June 2014.

In the end, on June 30, 2014, the Republic of Korea requested the second page of the Republic of Korea, and the F consenting thereto was present at the Seoul Southern District Court as a witness and selected him, and then prepared a consignment sale of the works entrusted to A on March 4, 201, and did not return the said works until it has yet to be returned to A.

“The purpose of this study is to make false perjury.”

Accordingly, the Defendant instigated F to give a perjury as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.F.