Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

The defendant is the representative director of agricultural partnership D in Go Chang-gun C.

On 208, the Defendant was selected as a subsidy project operator for the promotion of the Go Changpy Factory in accordance with the plan for the promotion of the Special Products in Jeollabuk-do, Jeollabuk-do, and was willing to submit the details of the disbursement of the total construction cost in advance to receive the subsidy by making a contract for the facilities and equipment of the military with the total project cost of KRW 812.5 million ( KRW 395 million in national expenses, KRW 395 million in Do expenses, KRW 39.5 million in Do expenses, KRW 39.5 million in Gun expenses, KRW 338.5 million in Gun expenses).

On January 5, 2009, the defendant obtained a loan of KRW 130 million from the Jin Chang-gun, Chang-gu, Chang-gun, Chang-gun, Seoul, to deposit KRW 100 million in the account of one bank (F) in the name of E in double KRW 100,00,000,000 from the Jin Chang-gun, Chang-gun, Chang-gun, Chang-gun, Seoul, and received a return from G (the same day of non-prosecution) other than the case in which he is well aware of such fact to the

1. Until June 1, 200, a total of 590 million won was issued from Go Chang-gun by submitting to the public official in charge of Go Chang-gun the certificate of deposit in the passbook, which is a false construction cost payment data of KRW 590 million, and the certificate of deposit in the passbook, a total of six copies of transfer data, and three copies of deposit data paid at the person who paid the money, as if the expenses were paid in full 60 million in the cost of purchase and installation of molecular machinery and equipment among the above businesses.

As a result, the Defendant received a subsidy of KRW 395 million from Go Chang-gun on January 19, 2009 by illegal means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Nine copies of the certificate of deposit and transfer data without a passbook; and

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal investigation;

1. Article 40 of the Act on the Management of Subsidies for Relevant Acts concerning Criminal Facts (Consideration of fines, the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the fact that self-paid charges and subsidies are appropriated for project expenses, etc.);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;