However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 19, 2015, around 14:15, at the same time as the Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Dong-gu, 255, the Defendant expressed C’s desire to “C, e.g., C, a police officer belonging to the Daegu-dong Police Station B, a police station located in the patrol vehicle, for the purpose of preventing traffic accidents.” The Defendant expressed C’s desire to “C, e.g., f., f., f., e., f., f., e., f., f., e., f., f., e., f., f., f., e., f., f., e.,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention of traffic accidents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of work place;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence include the fact that the defendant has been punished several times for violent crimes, but there is no history of fine or heavier punishment, the recognition of the instant crime and reflects the mistake, the degree of assault and other favorable circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as the same as the disposition, comprehensively taking into account all the conditions for sentencing, including the defendant's age