2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a teacher on March 24, 1975 and served as a teacher at B elementary school located in Sungnam-si from March 1, 2010 to Sungnam-si.

B. On August 25, 2015, the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff violated the duty of integrity due to the following reasons, and imposed a surcharge of KRW 9,750,000 on the Plaintiff.

(2) On April 7, 2015, the Plaintiff received money and valuables worth KRW 3,250,000 from eight parents, including the mother of C students, from October 2010 to April 9, 2015, including the mother of C students, in the class of the second and fifth grade class of the second grade class of the B elementary school where C students are in his/her possession, and thereby, receive the right to use the beauty pump equivalent to KRW 250,000, from the mother of C students, etc.:

(hereinafter referred to as “instant Disciplinary Reason.” According to the detailed statement, which provides the amount classified into temporary money and valuables once a year, the mother of 14:00 cash 50,000 d 10,000 d 10,010 d 50,000 f 14:4:00 f 14:00 f 10,000 f 10,000 f 14: 30: 300,000 f 14: 30,000 f 30,000 f 10: 30,000 6: 14: 0,000 6: 20,000 7: 1: 40,000 f 1: 0,000 g 1: 20,000 g 1:5,201 Y 1:5,200 g 105.

The cosmetic usage voucher 8:4:00 on April 9, 2015, 3,2500 J mother of merchandise coupons 300,000 on the aggregate of 2-year 5 merchandise coupons 3,250,000

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed a petition review on August 28, 2015. However, the Teachers’ Appeal Committee rendered a decision to dismiss the Plaintiff’s petition on November 11, 2015.

Meanwhile, on the other hand, the Plaintiff from Suwon District Court (2015No7751) on May 18, 2016 to a fine of 5,500 for the following criminal facts.