If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

피고인은 2013. 4. 14. 00:30경 인천 남동구 B에 있는 인천남동경찰서 C지구대에서, 당시 D소방서 뒤편에 있던 미니포차에서 어떤 사람으로부터 멱살을 잡혀 신고를 하였는데 신고를 받고 출동한 위 지구대 소속 피해자 경사 E(44세)가 일방적으로 귀가를 시켰다는 이유로 위 지구대에 다시 찾아가 그곳 민원인 F 등이 보고 있는 가운데 피해자에게 "이 새끼들, 모가지를 꼭 자르겠다, 씹새꺄, 개새끼, 너 같은 놈이 경찰이냐, 개새끼야, 너 씹할 놈아 니 각시 발가벗기고 보지나 빨고 다녀라"라고 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion on the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserted that he was in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder by drinking at the time of committing the instant crime, according to the records, the Defendant was aware of drinking at the time of committing the instant crime, and in light of the background leading to the instant crime, method of committing the instant crime, and the circumstances after committing the instant crime, etc., the Defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of committing the instant crime.

Since it seems that the defendant was in a state or weak condition, the above assertion by the defendant is rejected.