except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 12, 2015, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving B car car, was driving the said car on July 12, 2015, and was driving the car at a speed not to be on the speed of the city at the speed from the distance of the U.S. office to the section of the U.S. office of the U.S. office.

Since there is a center line of yellow-ray, there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving service should thoroughly operate the entire city and safely in compliance with the tea.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving the said car while driving the car.

The part of the front part of the vehicle driven by the victim C(59 years old), which was driven by the victim C(59 years old), which was driven by the central line in the opposite line, was the front part of the vehicle being driven by the victim, and due to this, the above colona bom used the vehicle to let the victim E(53 years old) drive the front part of the F rocketing car.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim G (n, 27 years of age) who is the partner of the Defendant driving vehicle, on the part of the victim G (n, 27 years of age), such as a dys of fys of fys, which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment, on the part of the victim H (n, 28 years of age) of the same fys of fys, tensions, tensions, etc. which require approximately 2 weeks of treatment, on the part of the same fys of the victim I (the 27 years of age) who is the same fys of the vehicle; on the other hand, on the part of the fys of the above fys of the vehicle; on the other hand, on the part of the victim J (n, 55 years of age), the victim who is the fys of the above fysing fys of the vehicle; on the other hand, the victim fys of the fys.