However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On December 2, 2011, the Defendant: “E” in the mutual title “E” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; “E”, the Defendant: (a) had the Victim G sell the leased house site to the construction business operator; (b) it is necessary that the amount of KRW 70,000,000 is not currently becoming a civil engineering work corporation; (c) the principal shall be repaid on and after the two months; and (d) the Bank shall pay the principal to the two months; and (d) if the interest is paid to the Plaintiff, the safety device will jointly register the Victim’s name in the said site; and (e) at a certified judicial scrivener office where it is impossible to know the trade name located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, as a joint name, the Defendant again called the victim to the above purport.

However, at that time, the Defendant purchased three parcels of land, including Ulsan-gun H around that time, and appropriated the purchase price of the said piece of land to KRW 100 million for KRW 150 million for the Defendant’s partner, KRW 150 million, and KRW 300,000,000,000 from the Hansan Saemaul Bank, but the civil engineering on the said plot of land was suspended due to the lack of equipment cost, personnel cost, materials cost, etc., and the said amount of interest was paid up to KRW 2,00,000 per month as interest on the said loan, but the interest payment was overdue, and the auction procedure was in progress on December 21, 201, since the decision to voluntarily commence the auction on the said plot of land was made, even if the victim borrowed money from the victim, the said site was developed as a joint name, and there was no intention or ability to repay the said amount to the victim.

On January 18, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 70 million from the victim to the said bank account in the name of the said F, which was designated by the Defendant, from the said F, and received KRW 70 million from the said F to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of the Defendant on January 19, 2012.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. G, .