(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.08.30 2013고단1646
도로법위반
Text
The defendant is innocent.
Reasons
1. A violation against the restriction on vehicle operation on August 29, 2005, which is an employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, around 12:23:
2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.
Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
참조조문
-도로법