However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with C on December 3, 2007.

On December 2, 2013, the Defendant, who was in Ma, was sexual intercourse with B once with B in the “E” operated by the Defendant, who was a policeman at the Seocho-si.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above A, the date, time, and place described in paragraph (1). As seen above, Defendant B had sexual intercourse with A once.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Marriage relation certificate:

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning a divorce and a certificate of complaint receipt;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: the first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant B: the latter part of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act, and the preamble

1. Defendants in a suspended sentence: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 200