When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 21, 2014, from around 23:00 to 23:30 of the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s bar business by force by getting the customers who had drinking in the main point of the week from around 23:00 to 23:30 of the same day, and preventing them from entering the main point of the week from entering the main point of the week, and preventing them from entering the main point of the week.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (the face value, beer, beer, and beer, of which the crypt is scattered);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is not only a crime during the period of suspension of the execution of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but also a criminal defendant has been sentenced to a fine on several occasions due to drinking.

However, the defendant's leader was subject to death on behalf of the victim, and the victim was regarded as the defendant and the victim was not punished.

There is no possibility of change in the drinking habits of the defendant as well as his family members and relatives surrounding the defendant have been healthy, as they have long been divorced and divorced, and seek drinking treatment.

Since monetary damage is minor and the defendant is bound by detention, and his/her mistake is against him/her, the punishment shall be determined as per Disposition.