2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Defendant is a legal entity that operates the D Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and the Plaintiffs are the parents of the network E (hereinafter “the deceased”).

B. The Deceased was used on April 19, 2008 at around 19:10, and was transferred to the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital around 19:33.

On April 19, 2008, a medical team, such as a doctor affiliated with the Defendant hospital (hereinafter “the medical team at the Defendant hospital”), taken brain CT of the Deceased on or around 20:34, 2008. As a result, there was a high degree of cerebral cerebral blood on the right side of the Deceased, such as cerebral blood and cerebral dyssis, and cerebral dyssis.

C. From April 19, 2008 to April 03:00 on April 20, 2008, the medical team at Defendant Hospital performed the opening and the blood salvation surgery (hereinafter “the first surgery”). D. On April 20, 2008, the deceased’s re-recording brain CT on or around April 17, 2008, the part of the blood salvology was removed, but a considerable amount of blood transfusion remains, and the brain salvine salvine salvine salvine salvine salvine salvine salvine salvine salvine salvine salvine salvine salvine salvine salvine 1 to the deceased (the Defendant Hospital’s 204: 08 malvine salvine salvine salvine s. 208.).

F. At around 00:37 on April 24, 2008, the Deceased died of cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral brain as a result of cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral dys.

[Reasons for Recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-4, Eul evidence No. 1 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the cause of the claim;

A. The medical team at the Defendant Hospital dies by negligence as follows.