To the extent that it does not harm the identity of the facts charged, the defendant's right to defense, part of the facts charged was revised and stated in accordance with evidence relations.

[Criminal record] On December 3, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of aiding and abetting the violation of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act at the Jeonju District Court on December 3, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 2, 2011.

[2] The Defendant: (a) supplied the victim E with the 60,000 litress of gasoline 60,000 litress of annual gasoline 60,000 litress of normal circulation through D at D’s office located in Ilyang-si, Young-si, Busan-si, Seoul-si, around July 2008.

When preparing cash, 60,000 liters will be supplied immediately.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to supply 60,000 liters, even if he receives no gasoline payments from the injured party.

The Defendant received 12 billion won as the annual gasoline price from the injured party around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

[Defendant and defense counsel are those who do not have the ability to supply gasoline at low time, and they are supplied to D or victims with gasoline without delay.

The fact also argues that there is no fact that 12 billion won per annum has been received from the injured party through D.

At D’s request, the Defendant only informed only the contact point of F, which can supply gasoline without a smoke to him, and D provided F with a smoke gasoline.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant introduced the victim through D and provided the victim with no gasoline to the victim without any delay, and the question is whether the party who traded the case with the defendant is D or not.

l.p. g., p.