(a) In addition, indication of drawings (1), (2), (3), (4), and (1) of the 1st floor of the building listed in the attached list;

A. On May 18, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant and the first floor of the building indicated in the attached Table, with the content that the portion of “(a)” part of “(a) on the ship connected in sequence of each point is 185 square meters (hereinafter “instant store”) as the lease term from June 30, 2017 to May 29, 2019, the lease deposit is 20 million won, the monthly rent is 3 million won (payment in advance on May 30, 201).

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

The money paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff under the name of lease deposit, rent, etc. in relation to the instant lease agreement is as listed in the following table.

On May 18, 17, 190, the amount of the deposit contract amount of 2 million won and 1.5 million won for 3,500,000 won for 3.5 million won for 17,000 won for 3,000 won for 3,000 won for 3,000 won for 3,000 won for 3,000 won for 3,000 won for 2,000 won for 3,000 won for 2,48,000 won for 3,000 won for 2,000 won for 3,07,000 won for 3,000 won for 3,07,000 won for 3,07,000 won for 3,000,000 won for 3,000 won for 29,000,000 won for 3,000 won for 3,017.

C. The defendant is running at the store of this case until the date of closing the argument of this case.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's 1 and Eul's 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion did not pay the rent of KRW 10.5 million until April 30, 2018, and damages the leased object. For this reason, the instant lease contract is terminated by the delivery of a duplicate of the complaint of this case.

Therefore, the defendant delivers the store of this case to the plaintiff, and ① the sum of 25.2 million won in arrears or unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent in arrears deducted 20 million won in deposit, ② 5.2 million won.