2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. On July 14, 2010, the Defendant is the implementer of the D Housing Development Project (hereinafter “instant public works”) publicly announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on September 17, 2010, as C, as announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, and C, as announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on September 17, 201, and the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the two-story detached Housing (hereinafter “instant Housing”) on October 11, 2002 in the Southern-si located in the instant public works zone, and made a move-in report on the instant housing on November 11, 202.

B. On July 28, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision to the effect that the Plaintiff failed to meet the criteria for persons subject to relocation measures (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

Title: Guidance on the result of the examination of relocation measures for the D public housing zone as a result of the examination of relocation measures for the D public housing zone, the thickness does not meet the criteria for the relocation measures and is determined as disqualified, and the following matters shall be announced:

1. If an objection is raised as a result of the review of the measures for resettlement, the main time is to file an objection and explanatory materials in writing not later than 6 p.m. on September 2, 2016, and the result of the review at the time of an application for non-performance within that time limit is determined.

3. A revocation suit may be instituted within 90 days from the date on which he/she becomes aware of a disposition, etc. under Article 20 of the Administrative Litigation Act regarding the results of the review.

- A person subject to relocation measures - A person who has owned a legitimate house in the project district and has resided continuously in the project district (or the date of adjudication of expropriation) before the date of public inspection and publication of the residents (one year prior to the date of the conclusion of the compensation contract (one year prior to the date of the adjudication of expropriation) and has moved to the country after receiving compensation for the house due to the implementation of the project (excluding the owner of an unauthorized building, corporation or organization after January 25, 1

C. The Plaintiff filed an objection against the instant disposition on August 17, 2016, but the Defendant did not accept it.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6.