1. Fraud;

A. On April 29, 2010, the Defendant concluded that, at the (ju) D office operated by the Defendant of 103th floor of the 1st floor of the 1st floor of the Dasan-dong, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Manyang-si, the Defendant concluded that, “When he/she intends to import and sell the diaper for children in a single part, he/she does not have any down payment for imported goods. If he/she lends 20 million won to the down payment, he/she will immediately repay the diaper within one month after importing

However, in fact, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay money to the victim because (i)D operated at the time was fit, and (ii) even if he sold the said low-priced money due to the absence of any particular property, he was able to use it as expenses for the operation of the company, etc.

As such, the Defendant, as well as the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and immediately received KRW 20 million from the victim, from March 31, 201 to March 31, 201, received a total of KRW 47,182,273 in the same way as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes (I) from March 31, 201.

나. 피고인은 2011. 12. 16.경 서울 송파구 F에 있는 (주)D 사무실에서, 피해자 E에게 “내가 운영하는 (주)D의 브랜드 제품의 포장지에 탤런트 G의 초상권을 사용할 수 있고, (주)H이라는 고정판매처가 있어서 월 3,000만 원 상당의 고정소득이 발생하며 중국투자자로부터 투자를 받기로 되어 있으므로 투자를 하면 (주)D의 지분 50%를 주고 적어도 1년에 1억 원의 수익금을 주겠다.”라는 취지로 거짓말하였다.

However, on November 201, the Defendant was notified of the termination of the contract for the use of the portrait rights by the G above G around November, 201, and there was no fixed income equivalent to KRW 30 million per month, and there was no intention or ability to give 50% of shares or to reduce profits equivalent to KRW 100 million per year even if the Defendant received investment from the Chinese investor due to the lack of the fact that he received investment from the Chinese investor.

The Defendant is identical to this.