1. Forgery of private signature;

A. On July 31, 2013, at around 21:50, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising his/her name by stating “E” as if he/she had been aware of his/her name, at the police box located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si B, which was voluntarily accompanied by a assault case and requested to sign his/her voluntary behavior certificate from Patrol D.

B. At around 23:20 on July 31, 2013, the Defendant forged the Defendant’s signature with the purpose of exercising the Defendant’s signature by stating “E” at the end of the protocol of interrogation of a suspect, on the following grounds: (a) at the office of the Criminal Team of the Busan High Police Station of 1105, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant prepared the Defendant’s protocol of interrogation in relation to the assault case.

2. Events of the above investigation and signature;

A. On July 31, 2013, at around 21:50, the Defendant: (a) delivered to D a police officer a letter of voluntary behavior that forged E’s signature, such as paragraph (a) of paragraph 1, to a police officer who is aware of the forgery.

B. At around 23:20 on July 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) issued the written protocol of examination of a suspect who forged E’s signature, such as paragraph (b) to a slopeF who is aware of the forgery; and (b) exercised the same at the office of the criminal team of the Busan High Police Station located in 1105, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on voluntary consent;

1. Article 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. In light of the fact that among concurrent crimes, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, among the concurrent crimes, the defendant was placed in a case of assault and was investigated by the police as if he were another person and the nature of the crime was poor, the sentence of the defendant is inevitable. Other various conditions for sentencing, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc.