However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The Defendants of the 2017 Highest 1475, “The 2017 Highest 1475,” posted a false letter on the Internet trading website, and Defendant B conspired to acquire gift certificates by receiving gift certificates from victims by means of false speech as if they were sold in writing to the victims who reported and contacted the sales of gift certificates.

On November 8, 2016, the Defendants posted a letter stating that they sell cultural merchandise coupons on the website of the “China High-Tech” in the French Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul High-Tech”) and made a false statement as if they would send fin number of cultural merchandise coupons to the victim D who had contacted with the Defendants.

However, there was no intention or ability to send a pin number of cultural merchandise coupons even if the Defendants did not have a cultural merchandise coupon and receive the payment from the injured party.

As above, the Defendants: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received KRW 100,000 from the victim to the corporate bank account under the name of Defendant A for the same day; and (c) by the same method from that time until December 25, 2016.

1. A total of KRW 2,554,00,000, such as the statement in the crime inundation, was obtained by defrauding 19 times.

2. Defendant A, “The 2017 Highest 1578,” had access to the Internet portal site “China Highest Kapets” page on November 5, 2016 and sold cultural merchandise coupons on the bulletin board.

“The” posts a letter and reports it to the victim E who visited the victim E, “The payment of the price will transmit a Fin number of cultural merchandise coupons.”

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, Defendant A did not have a cultural merchandise coupon and did not have an intention or ability to transmit fin numbers of cultural merchandise coupon even if he received payment from the injured party.

Defendant

A, as above, a company bank under the name of the defendant A in the name of the victim, which deceivings the victim, and its deceivings 87,000 won as the price for the following day.