경범죄처벌법위반등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that the victim, as a taxi engineer, did not know the location of the destination and claimed excessive taxi charges against the defendant by boarding the defendant without knowing the location of the destination, although he/she was to safely leave the defendant, who is a passenger, to the destination. Therefore, there was justifiable reason for the defendant not paying the taxi charges.
2. The Defendant also asserted the same purport in the lower court, and the lower court rejected the above assertion in detail, stating in detail the decision.
In light of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the court below rejected the defendant's assertion and found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.