When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 10:50 on July 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed that “Cnoman’s room” located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B was 112, and the Defendant expressed that “E, a police officer belonging to the Incheon Yeonsu Police Station D District, is frighter,” and fright the food on the table, she saw the Defendant who frighter, she was frighter, and she was frighter, and she was frighter, and she was frighter, and she was frighter to the right side of the chest, walked one time to walk the right side, walk the right side of the chest, walked the Defendant’s frighter’s underground parking lot located in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City residential area at around 11:30 on the same day, and she was frighter or frighter’s family, and she was frighter or she was frighter’s family.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E, H and G;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which shows the attitude of recognizing and reflecting a criminal act by the defendant, and the primary offender who has no penal power, etc., are more favorable. In light of the favorable circumstances, the fact that the nature of the crime committed against the police officer who has worn the uniform is bad, considering the unfavorable circumstances, and considering the various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the