성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강제추행)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Around the night of the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against a minor under the age of 13 by forcing the victim with mental disability by rhymizing the victim F (at the time, 12 years old, 2 years old, 3 years old, 3 years old, 4 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 5 years old, 10 years old, 1.
2. The Defendant, at the same place around spring of spring of 2014, committed an indecent act by force against a victim with mental disability by entering the victim F, who is playing in the playground, near the above victim F (the age of 13 at that time), and by entering into the victim’s cream.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each police statement of G and H;
1. A written statement of additional completion of G;
1. Stenographic records;
1. A certificate, family relation certificate, and a certified copy of resident registration;
1. Determination as to the assertion of the accused and the defense counsel, each investigation report (Evidence Nos. 2, 5, 9, 16, 21) (Evidence List Nos. 2, 5, 9, 16, 21), recording records
1. Although the summary of the argument regarding the crime of the crime of paragraph 1 of the holding, the defendant recognized the fact that the victim's her part and her her m, but there is no fact that her sher sher sb
2. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence revealed by the evidence admitted as evidence of guilt, the Defendant’s assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel cannot be accepted, since the Defendant’s chest was able to be found.
(1) A victim's statement of damage is very specific and consistent in major parts.
On July 29, 2014, the victim stated at the Seaba Center that "the defendant was not the mother of the defendant, but reproductive organs," but G, the mother of the victim, refers to the victim at the police station.