A. The relationship between the parties and the deceased’s apartment ownership 1) net D (hereinafter “the deceased”).

(2) On September 26, 2005, the deceased completed the registration of ownership transfer of the instant apartment on the ground of inheritance by consultation division on February 22, 2006. The deceased completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the instant apartment on the ground of the death of the apartment as indicated in the attached list (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. On May 28, 2010, the Deceased’s No. 1 written testament and written will document of this case was made by a notary public on May 28, 2010, that “the apartment of this case shall be bequeathed to the Defendant” in the presence of two witnesses in the presence of a notary public who belongs to a law firm F, and a notary public shall write down and read it, and then sign and affix his seal to each of the deceased and the witness to the law firm as stipulated in No. 403, 2010.

(2) On March 2, 2015, the Deceased prepared a testamentary document (Evidence A 4; hereinafter “instant written testamentary document”) as follows, stating that “the apartment of this case shall be fairly bequeathed as prescribed by the law between the Plaintiff and the Defendant,” and then received certification of the instant written testamentary document as a notary public G G G 309 on March 13, 2015.

[A Evidence No. 10 and appraiser H’s written appraisal result show that the instant written will (Evidence No. 4) of this case is recognized as having the same facts as the writing of the deceased’s written statement of bank transactions and on No. 3 (Evidence No. 3) written by the deceased’s life, and thus, the authenticity of the entire document is recognized. The Defendant asserts that the instant written will of this case was forged by the Plaintiffs, but there is no evidence to acknowledge that the written will of this case was forged by the Plaintiffs). D resident number (J-’s omitted): Gyeonggi-do.