When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 13, 2020, around 18:12, 2020, the Defendant carried a breath while under the influence of alcohol in front of the C cafeteria located in Sacheon-si B. The Defendant reported to 112, and the police officers, including E, etc., who belong to the Gyeongcheon-si Police Station D District Unit, reported to the 112.

Although the Defendant heard the explanation of police officers that the restaurant closed, the Defendant took a breath, breath, and chilled, and drhed the cler of a motor vehicle parked in front of the above restaurant, and tried to get off the click of the motor vehicle that was parked in front of the above restaurant, and to have the clicked on the road, and to have the click of the vehicle on the road.

Accordingly, E went to Defendant to stop and cause the Defendant, and the Defendant her flaged off, flaged off, flaged E, flaged E, flaged E, flaged E, flaged E, and flag E once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Records, such as the developments leading up to the dispatch of the police officer to the scene by the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of violence committed by the defendant against the victimized police officer, the fact that the victimized police officer wishes to leave the place of the defendant, the primary crime, the fact that there is a cadastral disorder and hearing impairment, and the overall sentencing circumstances as shown in the arguments of the instant case shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the overall sentencing circumstances.