Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On May 22, 2014, at around 09:10 on May 2, 2014, the Defendant disputed the issue of paying the daily and drinking values at the 'D' restaurant located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, with approximately 3,00 minutes of the Defendant’s table and the passage of the Defendant’s interfered with the Defendant’s daily operation for about 3,4 times, and the victim E (n, 54 years of age) who is an employee of the said restaurant that prevents him from doing so.

In this way, the Defendant interfered with the restaurant business of the above victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F, and part of witness G, legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (as regards suspect's assertion and payment of the value of food);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;