However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 00:35 on June 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the C week located in Seo-gu, Seogu, Daegu, and received a report, and obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the public safety and order of the police officer by assaulting the Defendant, such as assaulting the Defendant’s right side of the said E, by “I am home and home without interference with business”; (b) the police officer belonging to the D District Station of the Daegu Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Police Station D, which called “I am home and home without interference with business.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on-site situations, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is that a defendant reflects his/her mistake, the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the same criminal record or fine, and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, shall be determined as the order.