2. A favorable condition for the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant’s mistake is divided and operated, the Defendant’s closure of business of adult goods operated, and the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime because it was difficult for him to find jobs due to physical disability. However, even though the Defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime as the instant Pharmaceutical Affairs Act two times, in consideration of the fact that the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes again, and other circumstances that form the condition for sentencing specified in the instant argument, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.