손실보상금
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The legality of the appeal of this case
A. Ex officio, examining the legality of the instant appeal, the Plaintiff submitted a petition of appeal to the first instance court on September 26, 2016, which was before the Plaintiff was served with the original copy of the judgment, after the judgment of the first instance was rendered, and the petition of appeal was not written; the first instance court ordered the Plaintiff to clarify the purport of the appeal on October 12, 2016; the Plaintiff did not comply with the above order of correction on October 17, 2016; the first instance court sent the records of the instant case to the appellate court on October 26, 2016 without dismissing the petition of appeal; the Plaintiff submitted only the grounds for appeal to the effect that compensation for damage was requested on December 29, 2016; the Plaintiff did not appear on the date for pleading on March 21, 2017; and the Plaintiff did not appear on October 17, 2017 and on April 17, 2017.
B. According to Article 397(2)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, the petition of appeal shall state the indication of the judgment of the court of first instance and the purport of appeal against the judgment. According to the above acknowledged facts, the appeal in this case is unlawful because the purport of appeal is not specified.
C. The plaintiff asserted that he did not comply with the above order of the first instance court due to unavoidable circumstances, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it, and the plaintiff's above assertion is not accepted.
2. In conclusion, the Plaintiff’s appeal against the Defendants is unlawful, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.