However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 19:28 on November 21, 2019, the Defendant: (a) asked the victim’s inner part of the instant case from the E affiliated with D (Nam, 42 years of age) called “C” in front of the “C” in Mapopopo-si B, “C,” a two-minute bicycle for the first time, gps, and blood transfusion,” called “C,” and called “C,” to answer questions about the details of the instant case from the E affiliated with D(E, South, and 42 years of age).

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with life-saving and emergency medical services by assaulting the fire fighter dispatched.

Around 19:30 on November 21, 2019, the Defendant stated that “C” in the frontway of Mapo-si B, Mapo-si, 119, and that “A victim E, a fire-fighting official, who was dispatched after being reported to 119, ( South and the age of 42) is the patient’s wife,” and that “I am humbly, anywhere, I am humbly, I am humbly, and I am humbly, I am humbly, so that the victim would have damaged the victim’s character of face requiring treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time interfere with the legitimate performance of duties concerning emergency medical services by fire-fighting officials.”

Summary of Evidence

"2019 Highest 1540"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation reports (Securing violences, motion pictures, and USBs);

1. Investigation Report (victims and a witness statement) - Each statement of the E, F andG;

1. Emergency medical service log, dispatch order, and D Service log "20 Madan30";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Investigation Report (Attachment of images related to the criminal situation of a suspect) - Application of CDs and photographic data-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 50 (1) and (c), 16 (2) of the Framework Act on Fire Services for the relevant criminal facts, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Each of the facts charged of this case under Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (Punishments imposed with the heavier punishment) shall be deemed to have been prosecuted for the purpose of supplementing any omission in the indictment, which was first prosecuted.